<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com">
<title>Diogenes recent issues</title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Diogenes RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Diogenes</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0392-1921</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/24?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/60?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/72?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/84?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/95?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/110?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/151?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/2-3/187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/26?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/41?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/74?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/94?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/128?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/1/138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/1/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/27?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/45?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/55?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/69?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/91?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/134?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/4/137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/4/140?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/35?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/55?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/67?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/77?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/97?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/129?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://dio.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Diogenes</title>
<url>http://dio.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Philosophy in Russia: History and Present State]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper sketches an historical outline of philosophy in Russia from the modern era to present time. It describes the main philosophical trends that characterized the &lsquo;Silver Age&rsquo; in pre-revolutionary Russia (Cosmism, religious philosophy and early Marxist philosophy), and draws some lines of continuity both with Marxist and pre-Marxist philosophy. It studies the internal evolution and organization of Soviet official philosophical thought, and describes the main features the philosophical Renaissance that took place in the Soviet Union in the second half of the 20th century. It finally describes the main trends, authors and publication of philosophy in Russia today.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guseinov, A. A., Lektorsky, V. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109343635</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Philosophy in Russia: History and Present State]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/24?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Russian Philosophy in the Context of European Thinking: The Case of Vladimir Solovyov]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/24?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Russian philosophy of the 19th century was developing in close contact with European philosophy. The strongest influence on Russian thought was exerted by classical German philosophy. One significant example is the teaching of Vladimir Solovyov, an outstanding 19th century thinker. Solovyov owes several principles of his teaching to Friedrich Schelling, from whom he assimilated his cardinal concept of all-embracing being; also to Schelling we can trace Solovyov&rsquo;s conviction that the will constitutes the determining principle of being as well as his conception of the suffering and developing God. Finally, it was largely through Schelling&rsquo;s influence that Solovyov shaped his cosmogonic theory associated with his sophiology, based on the thesis of the falling away from God of His &lsquo;Alter Ego&rsquo;, His &lsquo;Prototype&rsquo;. According to Solovyov, &lsquo;the Second God&rsquo;, or Sophia-Wisdom, is God-Made-Man, the Absolute coming into being, whose life underlies the substance of historical process.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaidenko, P. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109341608</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Russian Philosophy in the Context of European Thinking: The Case of Vladimir Solovyov]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>36</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paradoxes in the Communist Theory of Marxism]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In their work The German Ideology, the founders of Marxism assert that the prerequisite of post-capitalist (defined by them as communist) society is the universal development of human abilities and all social relations. But then on the same page, contrary to this statement, it is alleged that the abolition of private property is not only highly topical but it is also an imperative history-making task. In Manifesto of the Communist Party, Marx and Engels explain that economic crises recurrently shaking capitalist society expose an apparent contradiction between the productive forces and the capitalist relations of production &ndash; therefore, these relations must be eliminated for the preservation of society. Nonetheless, the same treatise affirms that the bourgeoisie cannot exist without revolutionizing not only the productive forces but also the relations of production. But in this case it stands to reason to recognize that there is no conflict between productive forces and production relations, and, therefore, there is no crisis of the capitalist system, either. Paradoxes in the communist theory of Marxism stem not merely from erroneous conceptions but reveal the fact that Marxism as an ideology comes into conflict with its scientific social theory. Hence, these paradoxes disclose the relative independence of the social theory of Marxism from its ideological postulates.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oizerman, T. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109341703</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paradoxes in the Communist Theory of Marxism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/51?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Anonymous Community]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/51?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The paper explores the non-institutional potential of the concept of community as it has been formulated in contemporary French philosophy. Special attention is given to historical experience, particularly in a globalizing world. Fantasies of the historical which attest to such experience are treated as constitutive of an anonymous community defined neither by a fixed identity nor by a given substance. Despite its anonymity, community calls for articulation and translation, producing various &lsquo;as-if presentations&rsquo;, to remember the Kantian term.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petrovsky, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109336374</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Anonymous Community]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>59</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/60?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New Models of Development and The Problem of Values]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/60?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper presents a series of analysis of social transformations, from the standpoints of civilizations and formations. The idea of multiple models of development of civilization is exposed. The fundamental values underscoring the traditional and technogenic models are presented. The contemporary crises are studied in its link to globalization. It is argued that, in order to overcome these crises, a substantial transformation of the values of the techngenic civilisation is needed. The upraising values in the spheres of religion, politics, law and scientific rationality are seen as a first step towards a new model of development of our civilization.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stepin, V. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109341701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New Models of Development and The Problem of Values]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>60</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/72?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barbarity as the Reverse Side of Civilization]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/72?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This article analyzes philosophical discussions on the problem of barbarity as the reverse side of civilization in general, and of the modern civilization in particular (as exemplified by the works of K. Offe, L. Klausen, K.-Z. Reberg, M. Miller, H.-G. Soeffner, S.N. Eisenstadt and Z. Bauman. Joining in these discussions, the author makes a critical appraisal of these works and presents (in brief) her own conception of civilization which she has been elaborating for the last 25 years. Particular attention is drawn to the studies of barbarity implanted in the development of the modern civilization and revealed in the various forms of present-day barbarism (ecological, political, militaristic violence, utter dereliction in daily life, etc.), especially evident in &lsquo;outbursts&rsquo; of violence, suppressing and violating legal rules and moral principles (fascism, totalitarianism, international aggression).</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motroshilova, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109336376</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barbarity as the Reverse Side of Civilization]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>83</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/84?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Remarks on Russian Philosophy, Soviet Philosophy, and Historicism]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/84?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper concerns two themes: my personal experience of Russian philosophy and Russian philosophers on the one hand, and historicism on the other. My account of my limited experience of Russian philosophers and philosophy will be mainly autobiographical. My remarks about historicism will concern a single aspect of the philosophical consequences of the Soviet experience for Russian philosophy. When I come to Russia, I am always surprised by the degree of interest in a historical approach to knowledge, an interest that, so far as I know, is unique to Russian philosophy. This difference in perspective as concerns the historical character of cognitive claims needs to be explained. It needs to be explained why contemporary Russian philosophers and contemporary Russian philosophy are so hospitable to a historical approach to knowledge, an approach which has always been rare, even unusual, elsewhere. My hypothesis, which I examine the paper, is that there is a deep link between contemporary Russian interest in a historical approach to knowledge and Soviet philosophy. In particular, there is a link to Marx, who is a historical thinker, and to pre-Soviet Russian philosophy, as distinguished from Marxism, which is basically a-historical.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rockmore, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109336381</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Remarks on Russian Philosophy, Soviet Philosophy, and Historicism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>84</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/95?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Ethics of Force: Against Aggression and Violence]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/95?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In opposition to the absolutist ethics of non-violence, the author argues that in response to aggression and violence one has to use every means possible to prevent them. To resist violence is a moral duty of the individual. It would be desirable for violence to be prevented by strength of mind, but if strength of mind is not enough or the aggressor is insensitive to intellectual, spiritual and psychological impacts, one has to employ by accretion all necessary means. Ethics is called upon to set limits to the employment of the means of countering violence.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apressyan, R. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109339679</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Ethics of Force: Against Aggression and Violence]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>109</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/110?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Idea of Interdisciplinary Approach in Contemporary Epistemology]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/110?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper presents some perspectives in contemporary epistemology, relating in particular to the links between contextualism and interdisciplinary approaches. The author considers the role played by different theories of context in the frame of a social epistemology.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasavin, I. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109339683</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Idea of Interdisciplinary Approach in Contemporary Epistemology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Philosophy of Religion: A New Field for Russian Philosophy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper analyzes why philosophy of religion can surprisingly be considered a rather new field in Russian philosophy. While religion has played a major role in modern Russian culture, the philosophy of religion is still searching a precise definition of its object and domain. Initially, Russian philosophies of religion were inspired by Western influential works, whereas philosophy of religion is barely considered as distinct from theology. As such, philosophy of religion presents a double origin: in a wide sense, it coincides with philosophy, while in a more specific sense its origins are to be found in the modern era. From this point of view, Spinoza is seen as a seminal author for this field of work. This conception is analyzed and used to draw some perspective for the development of philosophy of religion in Russia.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shokhin, V. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109342836</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Philosophy of Religion: A New Field for Russian Philosophy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rethinking the History of Philosophy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Basing herself on Indian and Chinese traditions, the author provides arguments in favour of revising the customary understanding of philosophy per se. The nonexistence of uniformity in the methods of cognition cannot be taken as evidence for the phenomenon of &lsquo;philosophy&rsquo; missing outside the Western world. In the East, one can witness fidelity to the broad interpretation of &lsquo;philosophy&rsquo;, etymologically much nearer to this concept, presuming, along with rationality, the authority of other sources of knowledge. Philosophy came into the world not once but a number of times and in various places. From the outset it bore out, along with common generic traits, its specific &lsquo;patrimonial&rsquo; characteristics; in other words, those revealing its own culture. In its turn, each culture is built up around a certain &lsquo;frame&rsquo; made up of universal conceptual constituents. The history of philosophy would remain incomplete and one-sided (with a &lsquo;Western bias&rsquo;) until it ignores the fundamental universals of other cultures. Even the universals and values recognized as common to all mankind are frequently imbued with basically different substance depending on a context of relevant culture. The reappraisal of the history of philosophy should make the teaching system of philosophy multicultural.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stepanyants, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109339093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rethinking the History of Philosophy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>150</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/151?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Some Political Meanings of 'Civilization']]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/151?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the early nineties, the term &lsquo;civilization&rsquo; has undergone remarkable transformations and has assumed political and ideological functions it has not been fit for as a linchpin of the more than two-centuries-old academic discourse on &lsquo;civilizations&rsquo;. These transformations materialized in the political-ideological formations known as the &lsquo;clash of civilizations&rsquo; and the &lsquo;dialogue among civilizations&rsquo; which comprise a &lsquo;civilizational discourse&rsquo; in many respects alternative to the academic one. This essay intends, firstly, to uncover the structural and thematic differences between the academic &lsquo;civilizational discourse&rsquo; and its trendy alternative. Secondly, the essay aspires to demonstrate how complementary, at their methodological and ideological bases, the &lsquo;clash of civilizations&rsquo; and the &lsquo;dialogue among civilizations&rsquo; are, despite their highly-publicized antagonism. Thirdly, the article aims to highlight the actual political processes underway in our world which manifest themselves through and make use of the alternative &lsquo;civilizational discourse&rsquo; as part of their modus operandi. The essay ties these processes with the global triumph of capitalism at the closure of the 20th century, and with the rise of the projects of authoritarian hegemony.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kapustin, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109336380</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Some Political Meanings of 'Civilization']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Place of Russian Philosophy in World Philosophical History -- A Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/2-3/170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper sketches the ambitious outlines of an assessment of the place of Russian philosophy in philosophical history &lsquo;at large&rsquo;, i.e. on a global and world-historical scale. At the same time, it indicates, rather modestly, a number of elements and aspects of such a project. A retrospective reflection and reconstruction is not only a recurrent phenomenon in philosophical culture (which, the author assumes, has become global), it also is, by virtue of its being a philosophical reflection, one among many possible perspectives. The central claim of the paper is that the key to an assessment of the world-historical place of Russian philosophy is to be found in the Soviet period, not only because it was, through its isolation policy and its subordination of philosophy to political and ideological goals, a determining factor for a large part of the 20th century, but also, and more importantly, because it has systematically distorted the perception of Russia&rsquo;s philosophical history, including of the Soviet episode itself. The very undoing of these distortions, however, risks becoming a distortion because of, on the one hand, a demonization of the Soviet factor and, on the other hand, a disregard for its philosophical and meta-philosophical relevance.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Zweerde, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109336384</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Place of Russian Philosophy in World Philosophical History -- A Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/2-3/187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/2-3/187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109350006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2-3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>191</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia)]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper presents an overall view of the Philosophy of Tian-xia, a particular form of neo-universalism developed by its author and very much debated in the last years. The system of Tian-xia, or &lsquo;all-under-heaven&rsquo;, is a philosophical re-elaboration of an ancient form of Chinese universalism. The world is constituted as a global unity and a basic concept of political philosophy. It aims at a world institution as a way to rethink all problems in the world as problems of the world. Zhao Tingyang has analytically developed this view in some recent publications in Chinese. This article represents the most recent attempt to provide a synthetic view of his philosophy of &lsquo;all-under-heaven&rsquo;.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhao Tingyang,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Moral Crisis in Post-Mao China: Prolegomenon to a Philosophical Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For quite some time there has been a collective perception of a moral crisis in post- Mao China. This perception is informed by standards held by members of Chinese society rather than by standards outside of it. In this article, the author attempts to lay the groundwork for a philosophical analysis of this moral crisis. He first explains why it is appropriate to speak of a moral crisis and then examines the structure of the crisis. This examination is partly conceptual and partly causal. The conceptual section of the article discusses terms frequently used in connection with the crisis and introduces some terms and distinctions of the author&rsquo;s own for further clarity. The causal section traces the moral crisis to a crisis of identification with moral authority or exemplars, the latter crisis in turn containing important clues to the structure of self and agency in Chinese moral culture.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ci Jiwei,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Moral Crisis in Post-Mao China: Prolegomenon to a Philosophical Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>25</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/26?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[War, Peace, and China's Soft Power: A Confucian Approach]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/26?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The contemporary Chinese intellectual Kang Xiaoguang has argued that Chinese soft power should be based on Confucian culture, the most influential Chinese political tradition. But which Confucian values should form the core of China&rsquo;s soft power? This paper first explores the coexistence of state sovereignty and utopian cosmopolitanism through an analysis of Confucian tradition up to contemporary Chinese nationalism. It insists on the exogenous roots of the cosmopolitan ideal and its relations with the ideal of a harmonious political order and a global peace. Then, it compares the philosophy of &lsquo;all-under-heaven&rsquo; in its classical and contemporary forms, with Mencius&rsquo; theory of a &lsquo;hegemon&rsquo;, a theory that still informs the moral language that Chinese intellectuals use to evaluate foreign policy, especially regarding morally-justified warfare. It ends on a reflection on the role that Mencius&rsquo;s theory of just and unjust war can play in the contemporary Chinese context and to help understanding and defining the stance of China in the international geo-political context.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bell, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[War, Peace, and China's Soft Power: A Confucian Approach]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>40</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/41?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Micro-political Philosophy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/41?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Around the turn of the century, political philosophy became one of the most lively areas of philosophical study in China. An important trend of development is represented by the shift from macro-political philosophy to micro-political philosophy. A careful analysis of this trend is the object of this paper. It shows how, in the Chinese context, micro-political philosophy, micro-history, critique of everyday life, and other theories much debated in the West, are relatively new. As such, a solid foundation for micro-political philosophy must be found within the theoretical resources established in the 20th century western culture, then integrated to the Chinese context and absorbed by this latter to get inspiration.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yi Junqing,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Micro-political Philosophy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>52</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Core Social Values in Contemporary Societies]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This essay intends to build an analytical tool for understanding social values. It proceeds by defining the term &lsquo;social value&rsquo;, differentiating &lsquo;core&rsquo; and &lsquo;non-core&rsquo; social values and discussing their respective functions in society. Then, it extracts from social values a seven-tier system of core social values, built on seven basic social relationships: self&ndash;other, man&ndash;nature, individual&ndash;community, community&ndash;society, people&ndash;government, people&ndash;(state) nation, and (state) nation&ndash;world system. The corresponding views of right and wrong on these types of relationships are &lsquo;core values&rsquo; and concern perceptions of morality, nature, groups, society, politics, nation, and the world. The very core of the construct is the universal morality of human beings, and the outermost tier is the perception of world affairs. In a further section, the functional connection between the tiers is explored, to show how a core value system collapses. Lastly, the author presents a rudimentary idea of how a core social value system might be built or rebuilt.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pan Wei,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Core Social Values in Contemporary Societies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>73</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/74?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Under the Same Sky: A New World-view from China]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/74?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper deals with the geo-political implications of neo-universalist tendencies in current Chinese political philosophy. It is stated how Chinese philosophy can contribute to overcome a &lsquo;clash&rsquo; theory of intercultural relations. The author underlines that the growing economic and political role of China in this century forces China to develop a real global world-view tradition, and discusses Zhao Tingyang&rsquo;s philosophy of Tian-xia as a paradigmatic example of such new universalism.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sisci, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Under the Same Sky: A New World-view from China]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>82</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>74</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Confucian Politics and Its Redress: From Radicalism to Gradualism]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper addresses the current revival of Confucianism in China. It analyzes its political issues and outcomes, underlines the possible defects in Confucianism as a theory of politics, i.e., as a science and art of government and a public ethics. It looks back to the dialectical relationship between Confucius and Mencius and shows how the presence of Confucianist elements in 20th-century politics contributed to shape the public and political sphere in contemporary China. The strains between revolutionary and reformist orientations through the last century are still at work in current social movements and reflected in political debates.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lu Jiande,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Confucian Politics and Its Redress: From Radicalism to Gradualism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>93</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/94?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modernity and Confucian Political Philosophy in a Globalizing World]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/94?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The scholarship of Confucianism in China is in the process of restoration. Its historical missions are two-fold. It should preserve Chinese national characters and promote China&rsquo;s modernization. These objectives are partly in conflict with each other. To realize the former objective, it is necessary to stress a historical continuity and consistency, to re-examine and justify the preservation of classical Confucian ideas and values in order to provide spiritual support for Chinese cultural identity and social cohesion. As to the latter objective, it is necessary to reinterpret some part of the classical ideas and values and link them with the modern values such as liberty, justice and democracy. This essay analyzes the position of three Confucianist scholars, Jiang Qing, Chen Ming and Kang Xiaoguang, to show the different balances between conservatism and reformers when their writings confront the challenges of modernization and globalization.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen Ming,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modernity and Confucian Political Philosophy in a Globalizing World]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>94</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Political Slogans and Logic]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Slogans have always been highly popular in China. They are extensively used in politics, as a typical form of public behavior. They are the most convenient and practical means of mobilizing people. Many political slogans or posters are still fresh in the memories of those who experienced the years of war or revolution in China. The most familiar slogans for people these days are those of the Communist Party of China, which exerted an enormous influence on people&rsquo;s lives. The English word &lsquo;slogan&rsquo; has two corresponding meanings in Chinese: &lsquo;slogan&rsquo; and &lsquo;poster&rsquo;. Slogans are designed to be chanted, exclaimed or shouted by people in public, thus appealing to people&rsquo;s sense of hearing. Posters are designed to be written, and hence appeal to people&rsquo;s sense of vision. This paper explores political slogans from the viewpoint of logics. It analyzes their stipulative structure and the implicit presuppositions they contain. It argues that, from a formal point of view, effective slogans should be free from logical fallacy, easy to remember, and rationally demonstrable.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xia Nianxi,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Political Slogans and Logic]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Feminist Concept of Self and Modernity]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between community and individual is the key issue in contemporary political philosophy and ethics. The concept of self seems very important for individualism, communitarianism and feminism when they respond to relationships, particularly when we have to situate selfhood in the conditions of modernity. Consequently, this paper can be divided into seven parts. First it introduces the debate about the concept of the self between individualism and communitarianism. Second, it discusses the feminist critique of this issue and analyses the feminist concept of self, and then addresses modernity as the condition of women. Next it attempts to analyze how women situate themselves in the conditions of modernity. Then it discusses how Chinese women are reshaping their selfhood under the conditions of modernity, and finally draws some brief conclusions claiming that neither communitarian nor individualist self is adequate in contemporary society. Chinese women, it is argued, are expected to reshape their own selfhood resting on the positive side of Confucian ethics and a feminist concept of self.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiao Wei,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102161</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Feminist Concept of Self and Modernity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/128?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Most Fashionable and the Most Relevant: A Review of Contemporary Chinese Political Philosophy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/56/1/128?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper presents a review of the main trends of contemporary political philosophy in China. First, it provides a general picture of the presence of contemporary western political philosophy in China. It shows how the different political positions (New Left, liberalist, conservative) relate to the different stances adopted before Western authors, and focuses in particular on the reception of Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss in China&rsquo;s academic and cultural circles. Second, it provides an account of what might be contemporary Chinese political philosophers&rsquo; unique contributions to political theory. It pays particular attention to two Chinese scholars, Gan Yang and Zhao Tingyang. While both of them specialize in western philosophy, they neither echo western political philosophy nor repeat traditional Chinese political thought, but, rather, commit themselves to a transformation of Chinese tradition thought, in order to figure out some original and debatable theories. By focusing on analyzing these philosophers&rsquo; ideas and influences, the author hopes to answer two distinct but interrelated questions: how and why are they are so fashionable or popular, and whose thought might retain some pertinence in the context and issues of Chinese political tradition and the existing political practices.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou Lian,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Most Fashionable and the Most Relevant: A Review of Contemporary Chinese Political Philosophy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>128</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/1/138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Notes on the Contributors]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/1/138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Notes on the Contributors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/1/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/56/1/140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192109102164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>56</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 The principle of democracy is one of equal dignity for all cultures. But today the                 relationship between culture and politics, though close, often appears tense and                 occasionally contradictory. The introduction to this issue of Diogenes sketches the                 work done by UNESCO in the frame of the 'Pathways of Thought' Programme, particularly                 relating to the way in which a pluralist identity is created in multicultural                 nations, and to the relationship between non-material heritage, democracy and the                 quest for new forms of governance.               </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riviere, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096823</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The External Limitations to Democracy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>             This paper claims that what needs reinventing is not democracy as an ideal model,             but rather the prevailing reality in terms of a set of obstacles hindering the realization             of this model. Democracy can only be adapted to the new realities of the world             if these realities are also transformed in such a way as to make it possible for democracy             to properly function. The absence of norms on an international scale is manifested             by a de facto hegemonic power accruing to certain states. This paper attempts             a philosophical description of this situation through the difference between globalization,             that tends to reduce all individual difference, and universalization, pluralist             as its purposes can only be attained through a rationality of communication. Their             respective actors are also different, as well as the different models provided for the             evolution of the UN system.         </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rouanet, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096824</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The External Limitations to Democracy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>14</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trust, Strangeness and Hospitality]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p> This paper presents a way of building social cohesion open to diversity, assuming                 that democracy is alive only when it is reinvented. It challenges social trust to                 welcome diversity, thus allowing for a continual reinvention of democratic cohesion.                 Articulating cultural diversity and trust represents a major challenge for                 democratic coexistence. Philosophy is called to take into account the existing                 models of social cohesion and trust, and to reinvent democracy by defining a new                 paradigm of trust integrating social and cultural diversity. </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornu, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096825</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trust, Strangeness and Hospitality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>26</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/27?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Non- and Anti-Democratic in Post-Modernity]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/27?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 Is, or has, democracy a universal value? This is the main question raised by this                 paper, which distinguishes between two aspects of democracy: political institution                 in opposition to despotism, and political belief against any kind of slavery and subordination.                 The role played by intellectuals in the development of contemporary                 democracy, and the relation of democracy to mass culture and the influence of mass                 media on a true democratic attitude, are studied within the frame of an overall 'mass                 aesthetization' which characterizes contemporary societies.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamashita, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096826</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Non- and Anti-Democratic in Post-Modernity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/33?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[International Law and Democracy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/33?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This contribution intends to examine the role of democracy in the evolution of international                 law, and equally the role of the latter in the advancement of democracy, or,                 one might say, in its 'reinvention'. Two aspects of this broad theme are addressed:                 the influence of processes of democratization at the level of the individual nation on                 the evolution of international law, and the extent of penetration of democracy and                 democratic mechanisms within the processes of creation and application of international                 law. A rich record of examples drawn by international jurisprudence is used                 to illustrate these complementary processes.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin-Chenut, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096827</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[International Law and Democracy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>43</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/45?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Democracy versus Republic: Inclusion and Desire in Social Struggles]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/45?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>           This paper argues that the idea of inclusion is linked to the democratic tradition           rather than to the republican one. By analyzing the origins and meaning of these two           concepts, the author holds that democracy is rather linked to desire and republic to           will (and to the expression of desire), and concludes that, since North Atlantic political           tradition has not given a key role to desire, democracy, in order to overcome the           difficulties it has been encountering in all parts of the world, should take more           account of desire and of the social struggles it brings to the fore.       </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janine Ribeiro, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096829</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Democracy versus Republic: Inclusion and Desire in Social Struggles]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>53</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/55?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Equality and Democracy]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/55?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper analyzes the relations between public space, language, and democracy. It                 describes how dissensus, democratic citizenship, domination, and political speech                 are linked together in contemporary French political philosophy, referring in particular                 to Jacques Ranci&egrave;re, Miguel Abensour, Alain Badiou and Claude Lefort.                 Hannah Arendt's political thought represents a theoretical frame or reference for                 most of these authors, who relate to her work in different, and often discrepant,                 ways.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vermeren, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096830</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Equality and Democracy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tocqueville Reinvented or `Democracy in Brazil']]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper compares Tocqueville's concept of democracy to the social and political                 evolution of Brazil. It draws attention to the different points of departure which                 marked the establishment of American and Brazilian societies, through the works of                 authors such as Laura de Mello e Souza, Gilberto Freyre, Florestan Fernandes, Celso                 Furtado, and S&eacute;rgio Buarque de Holanda. It notes that, despite conditions being                 more favourable for the formation of a democratic society in the United States than                 in Brazil, subsequent to the founding periods a certain coming together occurred in                 the process of formation of the two societies. The 'similarity of differences' between                 American and Brazilian societies becomes clear as soon as one brings together the                 roles played by the three constituent ethnic groups of these societies, which, by their                 simple existence, link difference to inequality.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freitag, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096831</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tocqueville Reinvented or `Democracy in Brazil']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/83?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Republic, Nation and Democracy: The Challenge of Diversity]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/83?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper analyzes how cultural diversity in Argentina is calling into question                 modern political concepts like republic, nation or democracy. The phenomenon of                 population movements, the demand for recognition of indigenous people's rights, or                 the conflicts arising from claims to regions' right to life and identity - as in the case                 of the town of Gualeguaych&uacute; in Argentina - challenge the logic of the nation-state                 and its sovereignty as well as the republican principles of liberty, equality and                 fraternity. The author examines how far the representation of the Argentinean                 republic at the time of its foundation included a standardizing vision of diversity,                 and how the legacy of this representation brought about an ambivalence between a                 universalist wish to take part in the progress of humanity and the reality of an exclusive                 democracy that valued one culture over others. It studies the narrative of                 national identity and attempts to describe how, proceeding from this narrative, the                 opposition between civilization and barbarity affects the way Latin Americans see                 the great challenges presented by the future of democracy, and by the recognition of                 the plurality of cultural allegiances.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Villavicencio, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096832</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Republic, Nation and Democracy: The Challenge of Diversity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>89</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>83</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/91?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[African Women: Inventing New Forms of Solidarity]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/91?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 In contemporary African cultures women are going beyond domestic areas and                 getting involved in public affairs. They are acting in the social sphere. They are                 taking an active part in campaigns during the election process. Although in contemporary                 Africa these new ways of participating in public affairs are still closely associated                 with the religious domain, women are a major factor of social change in                 today's Africa.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boni, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096833</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[African Women: Inventing New Forms of Solidarity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intercultural Communication and New Forms of Citizenship]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper presents some thoughts focusing on the problems of ethnico-cultural                 communalism, its meaning in the current global socio-political context and its implications                 with regard to principles of democracy, citizenship and the nation-state. It                 gives particular attention to the issues of interculturality and intercultural communication                 (IC) as central markers in the contemporary socio-political landscape. The                 author claims that IC (particularly in its communal and ethnic forms) may prevent                 or resolve the communal separation that threatens many groups throughout the                 world. Apart from the essential role it has in production, reproduction and circulation                 of meaning within, as well as outside, the group, the discourse developed by                 communal communication media is an ideological, reflexive construction whose aim                 it is to create an impact on the social cognition of its receivers. This is why ethnicocultural                 groups scattered around the world generally have effective communal                 media that reinforce their social, cultural and political cohesion at local, national and                 global levels. Because, as well as expressing their positions and views on the issues                 facing a nation's society, this formal discourse provides group members with a legitimate                 and coherent framework for action and argument.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elhajji, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096834</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intercultural Communication and New Forms of Citizenship]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heritage, Culture and Democracy in Mexico]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This short paper deals with the difficult articulation of a diverse cultural heritage                 within a society and the democratic forms of assuring its social cohesion. Special                 attention is paid to the links between immaterial culture and the environment that                 transforms it into a structural element of social cohesion. Culture is seen as a 'mould'                 which shapes a shared behaviour, and democracy can be conceived as a system                 made up of elements of a cultural nature that go as far as implying safeguarding                 pluralism, respect and tolerance of all kinds of difference. This is the case with those                 countries where the structures of the modern state are in the process of disappearing                 and being redefined in new forms, whose essential feature is acceptance of cultural                 diversity. If we conceive democracy in terms of heritage and in terms of non-exclusion of cultures dominated by a dominant culture, then it results that Mexico                 has not experienced true democracy - either in the past or nowadays.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lopez Morales, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096835</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heritage, Culture and Democracy in Mexico]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimal Harmony, Mutual Enrichment and Strangification]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper studies the relation between modern democracy and Chinese cultural                 patterns. It introducing the concept of 'Multiple Others' to explain how the classical                 concept of harmony can help integrating cultural and social differences within a                 social body, thus allowing social cohesion to integrate diversity. The main classical                 concepts of ren, li, and yi are analyzed in both Confucianism and Daoism, and compared                 to the concepts of recognition and dialogue developed by modern political                 theorists like Ch. Taylor and J. Habermas.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shen, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096836</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimal Harmony, Mutual Enrichment and Strangification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[African Cultural Diversity in the Media]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 With the disenchantment with independence in Africa, economic failure, the crimes                 of the elites from the independence years, the paralysis of symbolism, and finally the                 states' loss of dynamism, the 1990s ushered in a so-called phase of democratization.                 This was about rethinking citizenship and the relationship to politics. This democratization                 was a response to the notion of diversity. This paper claims that the answer to                 this diversity issue fell far short of expectations and proceeds different examples                 taken from social, cultural and political life, including the struggle for recognition                 and the appearance of terrorist violence in sub-Saharan Africa. Multiparty systems                 designed to respond to the diversity question produced only many versions of the                 same by ignoring that true diversity is the encroachment on the same of the strange, the                 different and the unexpected.               </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bidima, J.-G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096837</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[African Cultural Diversity in the Media]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>133</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/134?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Democracy and Recognition: Building Research Partnerships]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/4/134?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper illustrates the demand for recognition by peoples through an analysis of                 the partnerships between researchers and Inuit communities in Canada and Alaska.                 One of the great questions concerns work in the field, namely to identify the most                 appropriate forms of interaction between researcher and informant, to recognize the                 multiplicity of indigenous voices, to avoid inappropriate generalizations, and to                 approach generational disparity.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Therrien, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096838</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Democracy and Recognition: Building Research Partnerships]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>136</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>134</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/4/137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Notes on the Contributors]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/4/137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096839</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Notes on the Contributors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/4/140?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/4/140?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108096840</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward a Transcultural Ethics in a Multicultural World]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper presents its author's famous distinction between globalization, as the                 process or vehicle by which ideas, habits and worldviews travel from one culture to                 another and are transformed in the process, and mundialization, as the taking in of                 the outside world into our own lifeworlds, a process by which the ideas and customs                 of other cultures are transported into our homeworlds. In this process, what was                 once strange and unfamiliar is transformed into something comfortable and familiar.                 This is the process that is generally known as cultural assimilation, and by virtue of                 which the boundaries of our individual homeworlds become constantly widened.                 Examining this phenomenon, which he calls the 'mundialization of home', leads the                 author to sketch the main features of a possible transcultural moral world.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cha, I.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092620</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward a Transcultural Ethics in a Multicultural World]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cultural Essentials versus Universal Values?]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper adopts a comparative approach to analyze the crucial issue of the dynamics                 between universally shared values and the essentials of different cultures. It                 presents the ways in which universal values are conceptualized in Western, Indian                 and Muslim philosophy, presenting not only a historical overview but referring to                 modern authors such as Daya Krishna, D.P. Chattopadhyaya, Richard Rorty,                 Muhammad Iqbal, S.H. Nasr and Abdolkarim Soroush to show how these authors                 implicitly use, or do not use, cultural essential and universal values in their own                 work. It is eventually claims that comparative philosophy is of crucial importance for                 the future of philosophical thought in a global world.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stepanyants, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092621</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cultural Essentials versus Universal Values?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toleration, Pluralism, and Truth]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper deals with three guiding principles of contemporary Western civilization.                 It explores the compatibility of Toleration, Pluralism and Truth, as well as their                 application to diverse domains of cultural activity and creation. There is no place for                 toleration, let alone pluralism, in the realm of logic and mathematics. Scientific conclusions                 allow diverse degrees of certainty. The realm of monotheistic religions                 excludes pluralism, but necessitates toleration. The domains of ethics and its related                 social institutions allow diversity in secondary matters, but essentially should be                 guided by universally valid principles. In the case of aesthetics, a diversity of taste                 suggests a virtually unlimited pluralism. Yet, a universal basic principle of aesthetic                 evaluation is suggested which would greatly reduce tolerable pluralism, although                 this assertion is made with less confidence than the insistence on basic norms in                 ethics.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roshwald, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092622</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toleration, Pluralism, and Truth]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>34</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/35?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Continuity of Tradition: On the prophetic song of the Sibyl: Judicii Signum]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/35?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 In Malta and Southern Italy, legends centred on the prestigious figure of the Sibyl are                 still known by the older people. In Majorca, the prophetic song attributed to the                 Greek Sibyl, Erythrea (6th century BC), is still sung on Christmas eve in the                 monastery-sanctuary of Lluc. This paper focuses on the history of this prophetic                 song since its adoption by the medieval Church and on its surviving tradition in certain                 areas of Catalan culture &ndash;  a fabulous example of cultural continuity.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092623</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Continuity of Tradition: On the prophetic song of the Sibyl: Judicii Signum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>45</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Universality of Economics and Cultural Diversity]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 The very diversity of cultures impels the economist to respect a principle of modesty                 when it comes to specifying the degree of universality to which the science of economics                 can lay claim. In considering this issue, this paper: a) criticizes the ambition                 of certain forms of economic thought to arrive at truths which are universal, and                 b) explores the modes by which contemporary economic science participates in a                 renewed pursuit of a universalist doctrine. It concludes that the logic of economic                 rationality implies a representation of the world that is incompatible with the diversity                 of cultures. At the same time, such diversity should not be raised to the status of                 absolutes. Combining difference and unity is a major challenge for current economics.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bienayme, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092624</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Universality of Economics and Cultural Diversity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>54</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/55?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards a Renewed Universalism in Law]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/55?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 Despite the phenomena of internationalization and Europeanization, legal process                 remains essentially national in character. However, certain domains of law are                 already unified. Focusing mainly on the French tradition and its contribution to the                 construction of a European legal space, this paper: a) criticizes the traditional                 methods used to manage diversity in law &ndash; unifying the law and co-ordinating those                 legal codes likely to be conflictual; b) studies the debate between universalism and                 particularism in private international law, a discipline whose essential object is the                 resolution of the difficulties derived from pluralism; and c) attempts to discern an                 appropriate path towards a 'renewed universalism' by pursuing a comparative                 approach which can open the way towards unification but must also be able to                 preserve the irreducible diversity of law.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fauvarque-Cosson, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092625</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards a Renewed Universalism in Law]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/67?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mathematical Universalism]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/67?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper presents a historical view of the rise of mathematical universalism in                 modern times. It argues that 20th century mathematical revolution laid the foundations                 for a <I>new universalism</I> which extended to physics, economics, informatics, and                 recently biology. It describes the role played by the organization of mathematical                 work for closer co-operation among scientists on an international scale throughout                 the century, and stresses the importance of mathematics in the education process.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cartier, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092626</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mathematical Universalism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/77?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Snapshots from the Development of the Natural Sciences]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/77?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper focuses on how the practitioners of the exact and natural sciences can                 make a contribution to the project of the social sciences to break free of a reductive                 Eurocentrism in order to achieve a renewed universalism. Focusing in particular on                 the last 50 years, the paper: a) describes the 1955&ndash;60 turning point that can be perceived                 in techno-scientific development and its relationship with society; b) analyzes                 technical developments under the two modes of gigantism and miniaturization, putting                 them in close relation with the political evolution of the world (Cold War and                 post-Cold War era) as well as with the phenomena of divergence/convergence                 among disciplines; c) explains the 'ethical movement in science' namely by introducing                 the idea of moral revaluation defined by similarity/contrast with the older and                 now well-accepted concept of scientific revolution; and d) sketches a typology of the                 scientific community's varied responses to the growing social protests around topics                 such as nuclear installations, health crises, genetically modified organisms, nanotechnologies                 and so on.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toulouse, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092627</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Snapshots from the Development of the Natural Sciences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>77</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Controversies around a Universal Model]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 Since Magellan's round-the-world voyage (1521), international issues have been                 embroiled in universalist claims. This paper investigates the controversial nature of                 a new economic universalism in the light of the social deficiencies and the limits of                 the available resources. The model of a global consumerism turns out to be inaccessible                 for billions of people. The market conceals a social dimension which ethics,                 equity, governance and identity are attempting to reintroduce. Consumerist universalism                 is faltering. The search for an alternative development model is crucial. It will                 need to be technically sustainable, socially more equitable, culturally more diverse                 and politically more participative.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albagli, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092628</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Controversies around a Universal Model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/97?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Scientific Rationality and Cultural Diversity]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/55/3/97?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>                 This paper examines the dynamics between scientific reason and cultural diversity                 by: a) analyzing the epistemic structure of 'universalism' as conceived by science,                 both theoretically and through its historical determination; and b) focusing on the                 situation of science in Africa, presenting its limits and challenges. It calls for a coconstruction                 of science at an international scale, which represents a key factor of                 development and cultural transmission, in particular, transmission of scientific                 scholarship.             </p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mve-Ondo, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092629</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Scientific Rationality and Cultural Diversity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005)]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092630</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>123</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Notes on the Contributors]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092631</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Notes on the Contributors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/129?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></title>
<link>http://dio.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/55/3/129?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0392192108092632</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>55</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>129</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>